Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
or(x, x) → x
and(x, x) → x
not(not(x)) → x
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(x), not(y))
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
or(x, x) → x
and(x, x) → x
not(not(x)) → x
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(x), not(y))
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:
not1 > [or2, and2]
Status: and2: multiset
or2: multiset
not1: multiset